An intact and healthy watershed and waterway network will tend to maintain most or all of the expected native aquatic fauna and flora over any one study period. As disturbance increases, fewer native species will be observed and this ratio will decline. Two types of aquatic animals that have been assessed in California are native (and non-native) fish and benthic macroinvertebrates (primarily early life stages of certain insects). Comparing the observed presence of native fish or other animals to what is expected gives an indication of environmental conditions and disturbance. The benthic macroinvertebrate indicator is represented by the California Stream Condition Index.
Fish indicators have been widely used and recognized as important tools to evaluate watershed and stream ecosystem health. A combination of native fish conservation status and the fish community composition will provide a complete evaluation of the fish condition in California watersheds.
NATIVE FISH STATUS
• Conservation status of freshwater fish: This is an evaluation of the threat status of the 129 freshwater fish native to California that follows a group-specific quantitative protocol detailed in Moyle et al 2011 (see scoring rubric in Appendix 1). Under this protocol there are seven metrics to assess fish threat: area occupied, estimated adult abundance, intervention dependence, tolerance, genetic risk, climate change and anthropogenic causes (including15 related categories). Each species is evaluated separately and then a summary report for the State is produced in terms of total species by threat category. The first specific assessment developed by Moyle et al (2011) would be use as the baseline evaluation to compare for long-term changes in fish conservation status. Evaluations are suggested to be carried out on a 5-year period.
• Status of key fish species: This metric is based on a species-specific assessment of conservation status. Some native species in California are of particular concern due to the rapid decline of their populations in the last decades. Examples include the Central Valley Chinook Spring-Run Salmon, Coho Salmon, Delta Smelt, Sacramento Perch. To consider few species (2-3) as state key indicators would not be the best approach due to the diverse and distinct biological regions across the state. Therefore, this metric will include 1-2 key fish species per each one of the 6 main zoogeographic regions in California . This metric will use the same threat status quantitative protocol by Moyle et al (2011) and will also include a species-specific distribution range analysis. Species-specific assessments are suggested to be carried out on a 5-year period basis.
FISH COMMUNITY COMPOSITION
• Percentage of native richness expected: This indicator compares the native species richness to the expected number of fish species by main zoogeographic/watershed region1. The expected native richness by main watershed region is obtained from Moyle (2002), which provides the historic (pre-1850) native fish diversity. Native richness would be evaluated periodically in a 5-year period.
• Proportion non-native species: This metric is the percentage of non-native fish diversity over total fish diversity (species richness) by main zoogeographic/watershed region1. Established non-native species will include species from outside California and also intra-state introductions. A baseline community composition data by main watershed region for long-term comparison and evaluation is provided by Marchetti et al (2004).